Is a gift on sale “heart-discounted”? Givers’ misprediction on the value of discounted gifts and the influence of service robots

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102489Get rights and content

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to investigate whether, why, and when givers and recipients perceive the value of a discounted gift differently. The studies provide convergent evidence that givers perceive discounted gifts as less valuable than regular-priced gifts whereas recipients do not perceive them as different. Givers' devaluation of the discounted gift is driven by their concern about the thoughtfulness of a gift. Moreover, the giver-recipient asymmetry is mitigated when the in-store interaction with a salesperson is substituted by technology via a service robot. This research contributes to the gift-giving literature and the growing literature on service robots by revealing how promotional offers influence consumers’ evaluation of gifts and how technological advance in retail may affect the proposed effect. Managerial implications for planning and executing price promotions for gifts are also discussed.

Introduction

Gift shopping presents vast business opportunities for firms with gift sales growing every year. The retail sales of year-end holiday gifts in the United States amounted $789.4 billion in 2020 with an increase of 8.3 percent versus a year ago (Shearman, 2021). The growth was more than double the 3.5 percent average holiday increase over the previous five years. Also, Americans did not tighten their gift budget despite unprecedented challenges of the coronavirus pandemic, spending $852 in average (Saad, 2020). As gift occasions include not only holidays but also celebration of milestone events (e.g., birthday, anniversary, and graduation) and expression of empathy and support in daily situations, retailers are keen on assisting consumers’ gift purchases to capture sales. Frontline sales employees would ask consumers for whom they are buying, make suggestions on a suitable gift, and provide further convenience such as gift wrap services and exchange vouchers.

As the retail innovation accelerates, service robots are appearing in-stores supporting gift purchases through gift packaging and comparing price (Bertacchini et al., 2017; Harris et al., 2018) Online retailers' assistance for gift purchases is also notable as consumers increase their gift shopping online (Thomas, 2020). Various tools such as Amazon's Gift Finder page targeting different age groups and gifting purposes and Gift Ideas page recommending the most popular products ordered as gifts have emerged. Online gift registries also suggest promotional offers at the time, recommend popular gifts, and allow easy returns. Moreover, social network services (SNS) are another emerging platform for gift-giving in recent years, as they provide social commerce within the natural context of interactions among users based on partnerships with retailers (Mamonov and Benbunan-Fich, 2017). Consumers enjoy a more immediate and convenient way of preparing and sending a gift in the form of digital vouchers and physical goods within SNS (Kim et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2019).

Given the opportunity of the gifting market, retailers provide promotional offers such as price discounts, coupons, and premiums for consumers purchasing a gift. Consumers may not only utilize promotion codes and seasonal offerings during the holiday events, but also find deals throughout the year when making purchase for others at an ordinary occasion like a friend's birthday. That said, empirical research on consumers' evaluation of sales promotion on gift purchase remains scant. Only a few studies have partially tackled the issue through exploratory investigations of sales promotion within the specific context of holiday shopping (Oh and Kwon, 2009; Thomas and Peters, 2011) and by revealing how evaluation of promotional offers differ according to the purchase target - for self or others (Lee-Wingate and Corfman, 2010; Yu et al., 2020). These studies do not directly uncover the influence of sales promotion on gift evaluation. Motivated by this research gap, the current research probes how consumers evaluate gifts on promotion, in particular, according to the role in exchange.

In fact, the gift-giving literature has largely focused on giver-recipient asymmetry on what makes a valuable gift, and has found givers' misprediction on the value of their resources dedicated into a gift. For instance, givers think that more money and effort in a gift would be appreciated whereas recipients do not hold such association on the gift's value (see Galak et al., 2016 for a review). Given that sales promotion is a salient means to reduce a giver's expenditure on a gift, would consumers be solely favorable about the offer while intending to signal care and commitment through gifts? Especially for price discounts which provide apparent monetary benefits for the giver with “reduced loss” (Sinha and Smith, 2000), how would consumers assess the value of discounted gifts? Although sales promotion provides economic and psychological benefits of being smart (Schindler, 1998), givers might need to cope with the social concern and anxiety about hurting the relationship with a discounted gift. Moreover, we examine a novel factor that may influence consumers' evaluation of discounted gifts – an agent in the retail (e.g., salesperson or service robot) that assists and witnesses the purchase of a gift. Although gift-giving is a matter between the giver and the recipient, we examine how an in-store interaction may influence how consumers perceive the value of the gift. To sum up, this research reveals whether, why, and when gift-recipient asymmetry exists in the evaluation of gifts on promotion. Specifically, three research questions are addressed: 1) Do givers and recipients evaluate discounted gifts differently? 2) What is the underlying mechanism for consumers' evaluation of discounted gifts? 3) How would an in-store interaction with a salesperson or service robot affect consumers' evaluation of discounted gifts?

Building on the sales promotion literature and prior works documenting giver-recipient discrepancies in gift-giving, we propose that givers and recipients have different attitudes toward discounted gifts. Five empirical studies including a preliminary survey and experiments demonstrate that givers perceive discounted gifts as less valuable than regular-priced gifts (i.e., no discount), whereas recipients perceive both gifts as equivalent in value. Such asymmetric responses toward discounted gifts come from givers' concern about the symbolic value of the gift. That is, givers perceive discounted gifts as less thoughtful than regular-priced gifts, which leads to devaluation of discounted gifts. Recipients, on the other hand, perceive discounted gifts as thoughtful as those with no discount. Furthermore, consumers' technology-driven retail experience of a service robot mitigates givers' underestimation of the discounted gift's value. Service robots do not give a pressure to the consumers on the normative value concerning gifts, and alleviates givers' concern that a discounted gift is less thoughtful and thus less valuable.

The current research has clear contributions from both theoretical and practical standpoints by revealing giver-recipient asymmetry on discounted gifts for the first time. Consumers may be less enthusiastic about deals when purchasing a gift for others. Although sales promotions may be economical, convenient, and exciting (Chandon et al., 2000), consumers may not always benefit from purchasing gifts on a promotion. Givers seem to fear that a price-discounted gift may come across as “heart-discounted” to recipients. We also adopt a new perspective to reveal what influences consumers' evaluation of gifts outside the dyadic relationship between givers and recipients and amongst a relatively indirect and wider audience at the point of purchase (e.g., salesperson, service robot). Considering the fact that gift-giving is a shared ritual within the society, the presence of a seemingly irrelevant spectator in the shopping process may influence givers' judgment on what makes a good gift. Furthermore, a technology-mediated retail experience of service robots could alleviate consumers’ reluctance toward discounted gifts. The results provide not only theoretical insights into the influence of in-store technology in retail experience but also practical implications for managers: communicating promotional offers for gifting occasions would be better off when implemented through technologies.

Section snippets

Psychological benefits and costs of sales promotion

Sales promotions are often regarded as opportunistic for consumers allowing efficient and effective consumption. Consumers may reduce costs or obtain additional gains in a transaction through monetary and non-monetary sales promotions (Sinha and Smith, 2000; Sinha and Verma, 2020). Furthermore, sales promotions provide utilitarian and hedonic benefits (Chandon et al., 2000). Besides monetary savings from promotional offers, consumers may enjoy utilitarian benefits of improved shopping

Empirical studies

To test the proposed hypotheses on the giver-recipient discrepancy for discounted gifts, five empirical studies were conducted. Study 1 is an exploratory survey on consumers’ actual experiences of giving or receiving discounted gifts. Study 2 tests whether the discounted gift is evaluated differently between givers and recipients using a scenario-based experiment. In Study 3, the psychological process underlying this effect is revealed by measuring the thoughtfulness of a gift. Study 4 finds

General discussion

The purpose of the current research was to examine how givers and recipients would assess the value of a discounted gift that is ostensibly reduced in the price but in fact equivalent in inherent worth of the product. As it is the utmost priority for givers to convey their thoughtfulness in a gift based on their motivation to establish and maintain a good relationship with the recipients (Belk, 1976), we predicted that the fact that the gift is on a discount may be concerning for givers. In a

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Institute of Management Research, Seoul National University.

References (125)

  • F.J. Flynn et al.

    Money can't buy love: asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation

    J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

    (2009)
  • F. Gino et al.

    Give them what they want: the benefits of explicitness in gift exchange

    J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

    (2011)
  • J. Givi

    (Not) giving the same old song and dance: Givers’ misguided concerns about thoughtfulness and boringness keep them from repeating gifts

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2020)
  • D.M. Hardesty et al.

    Persuasion knowledge and consumer reactions to pricing tactics

    J. Retailing

    (2007)
  • Y. He et al.

    Consumption in the public eye: the influence of social presence on service experience

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2012)
  • C.H. Kim et al.

    Premiums paid for what you believe in: the interactive roles of price promotion and cause involvement on consumer response

    J. Retailing

    (2020)
  • B. Larivière et al.

    “Service Encounter 2.0”: an investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2017)
  • M. Laroche et al.

    A cross-cultural study of in-store information search strategies for a Christmas gift

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2000)
  • D.R. Lichtenstein et al.

    An examination of deal proneness across sales promotion types: a consumer segmentation perspective

    J. Retailing

    (1997)
  • S. Mamonov et al.

    Exploring factors affecting social e-commerce service adoption: the case of Facebook Gifts

    Int. J. Inf. Manag.

    (2017)
  • K. Nash et al.

    The bionic blues: robot rejection lowers self-esteem

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2018)
  • D.M. Oppenheimer et al.

    Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power

    J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

    (2009)
  • E. Pantano et al.

    The effect of mobile retailing on consumers' purchasing experiences: a dynamic perspective

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2016)
  • A.G. Pirlott et al.

    Design approaches to experimental mediation

    J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

    (2016)
  • S. Robinson et al.

    Frontline encounters of the AI kind: an evolved service encounter framework

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2020)
  • A.J. Rohm et al.

    A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2004)
  • R.M. Schindler

    Consequences of perceiving oneself as responsible for obtaining a discount: evidence for smart‐shopper feelings

    J. Consum. Psychol.

    (1998)
  • J. Sengupta et al.

    Misrepresentation in the consumer context

    J. Consum. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • G.S. Adams et al.

    The gifts we keep on giving: documenting and destigmatizing the regifting taboo

    Psychol. Sci.

    (2012)
  • J.J. Argo

    A contemporary review of three types of social influence in consumer psychology

    Consum. Psychol. Rev.

    (2020)
  • J.J. Argo et al.

    The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context

    J. Consum. Res.

    (2005)
  • S.E. Asch et al.

    Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments

    Organ. Inf. Processes

    (1951)
  • B.J. Babin et al.

    Does Santa have a great job? Gift shopping value and satisfaction

    Psychol. Market.

    (2007)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: an application to coupon usage

    J. Consum. Res.

    (1992)
  • C. Beckner et al.

    Participants conform to humans but not to humanoid robots in an English past tense formation task

    J. Lang. Soc. Psychol.

    (2016)
  • D. Belanche et al.

    Frontline robots in tourism and hospitality: service enhancement or cost reduction?

    Electron. Mark.

    (2020)
  • R.W. Belk

    It's the thought that counts: a signed digraph analysis of gift-giving

    J. Consum. Res.

    (1976)
  • R.W. Belk

    Gift-giving behavior

  • R.W. Belk et al.

    Gift-giving as agapic love: an alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences

    J. Consum. Res.

    (1993)
  • S.J. Blanchard et al.

    The favor request effect: requesting a favor from consumers to seal the deal

    J. Consum. Res.

    (2016)
  • R.N. Bolton et al.

    Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms

    J. Serv. Manag.

    (2018)
  • J. Brandstetter et al.

    A peer pressure experiment: recreation of the Asch conformity experiment with robots

  • M.C. Campbell

    Perceptions of price unfairness: antecedents and consequences

    J. Market. Res.

    (1999)
  • N. Castelo et al.

    Consumer Adoption of Algorithms that Blur the Line between Human and Machine

    (2018)
  • P. Chandon et al.

    A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness

    J. Market.

    (2000)
  • S. Chandran et al.

    The price of “free”-dom: consumer sensitivity to promotions with negative contextual influences

    J. Consum. Res.

    (2006)
  • C. Chang

    Effectiveness of promotional premiums: the moderating role of affective state in different contexts

    Psychol. Market.

    (2009)
  • M. Cleveland et al.

    Information search patterns for gift purchases: a cross‐national examination of gender differences

    J. Consum. Behav.: Int. Res. Rev.

    (2003)
  • D.W. Dahl et al.

    Embarrassment in consumer purchase: the roles of social presence and purchase familiarity

    J. Consum. Res.

    (2001)
  • E. Denton et al.

    Mental stealing effects on purchase decisions for others

  • Cited by (7)

    • Don't tell me you are sorry with a gift: The negative consequences of apology gifts

      2023, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
      Citation Excerpt :

      Condition also directly affected gift appreciation (c’ = 0.50, p = .01). Usually, presenting product as gifts may positively affect product evaluations (Baumann & Hamin, 2014; Park & Yi, 2022). We demonstrate, however, that presenting products as apology gifts can negatively affect product evaluations and giver-recipient relationships.

    • Proposal for modeling social robot acceptance by retail customers: CAN model + technophobia

      2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
      Citation Excerpt :

      They enable new experiences within the retailer-customer interaction (Prentice and Nguyen, 2021) by combining advanced forms of intelligence (mechanical, analytical, and complex tasks), depending on the characteristics of the service encounter. In a retail service environment, SRs are technologically configured to interact with customers and engage them socially so that, unlike in interactions with self-service technologies (Park and Yi, 2021), customers perceive that they are interacting with another social entity that provides services. The role of NTs in retail has changed dramatically as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic (De Bellis and Venkataramani, 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text