Skip to main content
Log in

Direct regression, reverse regression, and covariance structure analysis

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the issues in estimating the effects of marketing variables with linear models. When the variables are not directly observable, it is well known that direct regression yields biased estimates. Several researchers have recently suggested reverse regression as an alternative procedure. However, it is shown that the reverse regression approach also fails to provide unbiased estimates in general, except for some special cases. It is proposed that covariance structure analysis with an appropriate measurement model can ensure the unbiasedness of estimated effects. These issues are examined in the context of assessing market pioneer advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ConwayDelores A., and Harry V.Roberts. (1983). “Reverse Regression, Fairness, and Employment Discrimination,”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1 (January), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • FershtmanChaim, VijayMahajan, and EitanMuller. (1990). “Market Share Pioneering Advantage: A Theoretical Approach,”Management Science 36 (August), 900–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • FornellClaes, and Fred L.Bookstein. (1982). “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory”,Journal of Marketing Reserch 19 (November), 440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoldbergerArthur S. (1984). “Redirecting Reverse Regression,”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2 (April), 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • GreeneWilliam H. (1984). “Reverse Regression: The Algebra of Discrimination”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2 (April), 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnstonJ. (1984).Econometric Methods, 3rd ed., NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • JöreskogKarl G., and DagSörbom. (1984).LISREL: Analysis of Linear Structure Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • RobinsonWilliam T. (1988). “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • RobinsonWilliam T., and ClaesFornell. (1985). “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries,”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (August), 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard. (1978). “Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-eat Breakfast Cereal Industry,”The Bell Journal of Economics 9, 305–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanhonackerWilfred R., and DianaDay. (1987). “Cross-Sectional Estimation in Marketing: Direct Versus Reverse Regression,”Marketing Science 6 (Summer), 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the previous version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fornell, C., Rhee, BD. & Yi, Y. Direct regression, reverse regression, and covariance structure analysis. Market Lett 2, 309–320 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554134

Key words

Navigation